Mccartney Kessler vs Cori Gauff Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent Performance on Second Serve: In the past six months, Gauff has shown a solid performance by winning 41.95% of points on their second serve. On the other hand, Kessler has exhibited an even better performance, winning 48.97% of points. It is imperative to acknowledge the noteworthy correlation between this specific statistic and the accuracy of predicting the outcome of a match.

Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: Analyzing the return game statistics, Gauff has proven to excel in recent form by winning 56.51% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Kessler has displayed an excellent performance, winning an impressive 57.57%. Looking closely at the first serve return statistics, Gauff has achieved a success rate of 42.32%, while Kessler has achieved 38.49%. These statistics are integral in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.

Composure under Pressure: Gauff has displayed remarkable resilience by saving 61.98% of breakpoints in recent matches. Conversely, Kessler has shown a slightly lower percentage, saving 56.57% of breakpoints. This statistical insight is essential for making accurate in-game betting predictions.

Performance Overview: Gauff boasts an impressive record over the past year, winning 75.71% of matches played (W/L 53/17). Meanwhile, Kessler has achieved a commendable winning rate of 62.5% (W/L 40/24). Examining these figures provides a valuable overview for predicting the outcome of their head-to-head matchup.

Surface Advantages: Gauff's greatest career success has been on grass, where they have won 71% of matches (W/L 24/10). However, their performance on hard courts has been less stellar, with a win percentage of 70% (W/L 139/59). Conversely, Kessler thrives on indoor hard courts, winning 77% of matches (W/L 17/5). On the other hand, their performance on clay courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win percentage of 53% (W/L 21/19).

Player Level: Over the past year, Gauff has primarily competed in the Masters series, achieving a commendable 73.68% win rate (W/L 28/10). In contrast, Kessler has predominantly participated in the Main tour, securing a 70.37% win rate (W/L 19/8). When comparing players' statistics to predict the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the context of the level at which they have been competing.

Opponent Quality: Gauff's opponents over the last 12 months have possessed an average ranking of 56.14, demonstrating their ability to compete against high-quality players. In contrast, Kessler has faced opponents with an average ranking of 143.45, indicating a relatively lower level of competition.

Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if this match reaches a deciding set, Gauff has achieved success in 60% of deciding sets played over the past 12 months. Kessler, meanwhile, has proven their capabilities by winning 64% of all matches played on tour that have reached a deciding set.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performance is undoubtedly useful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. For an accurate indication of an in-form player, it is advised to refer to the section below (if available), which presents the player's performance in the current event. Additionally, certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, which should be taken into account when predicting the overall outcome.

Break Point Conversion: Gauff has demonstrated a conversion rate of 47.84% in recent matches when presented with breakpoint opportunities. On the other hand, Kessler has showcased an impressive conversion rate of 51.11% when aiming to break their opponent's serve. These statistics provide invaluable insights for in-game live betting tips whenever either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

If you have an interest in mathematical models that predict tennis match outcomes, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Intended for statistical enthusiasts).